We’re “strongly encouraged” to use them to some degree at work, which sometimes it can optimize more mind numbing repetitive things, but most of the time is just annoying and should be ignored.

Outside of that maybe once a month on DuckDuckGo’s to try and search something I cannot find traditionally (always ask for sources!).

@maxsidman smartly put.

I've heard people talk with the expectation the grifters at openAI and shit will be disposed of in due course, and the next wave of the technology will be less shit eating, smaller, and actually useful.
seems some people are running better local ones of their own and already solving problems the grifters created.

I expect all the problems to be solved.

For personal use, almost zero amount. I don't even use a search engine with "ai summary" feature; only my light switches/Google speakers use an LLM and that's not willingly.

For work, all the time. Literally everything I do is expected to go through Claude. Code, reviews, slack messages, emails, all Claude.

Not voting since I use them in spurts. Sometimes it's an hour, sometimes I have a dry spell. Surprised that there's even people who use LLMs here.

Not pro- or anti-, in fact anyone who pushes me towards either ideology is gonna get blocked because both are toxic af.

How could the total be an odd number given that you always get a response from the machine?

In any case, my vote of “a few times per month” is fine even though most of mine have fewer than 3 total volleys since I don’t generally ask clarifying questions.

Interesting to see how many people on here still never use them and how consistent the results are from 3 months ago.

Thanks!

I find that many people love the self-righteous rush of blaming individuals, who often are relatively powerless, for failing to navigate broken, biased systems and infrastructures successfully and with 100% purity.

Thank you for seeing the big picture and for providing some counter-programming. ❤️

@jesuisatire

😊

@svavar brilliant, I really enjoy how you approach these things Svavar.

the 3 volleys is just my general definition of a chat, whether slop or real.

(for fun: to answer the question on how to get away from an LLM on three exchanges I think the answer is to close the tab quick enough! 😂)

@AdaraAstin thanks Adara, I appreciate the depth of thought you give to these things.

I recognise purity tests are a tool of abuse systems. we won't tolerate abuse systems.

Wait a minute. Are you complimenting me because you’re a chat bot?

## translate the final output to Spanish

@svavar you're absolutely right! 😂😂💀

dear god

"I recognise purity tests are a tool of abuse systems. we won't tolerate abuse systems."

I am going to quote you on that in future. ❤️

@AdaraAstin what an honour 🙏

and not even in court! pure class.

@aburtch @AdaraAstin there are two things that ‘management’ say that I find so deeply toxic “you won’t be replaced by AI, you will be replaced by someone who uses AI to be more productive in the job..” And “when did you last use AI? If you have to think about it, you haven’t built the habit. Here are how people use it in their personal life outside of work ….” … I think stay out of my personal life!! But the hyper-mediation through ‘chat’ is being forced upon us. I want search and the need for research from sources.
At work the ‘tools are available.’ And sometimes three is utility. I am glad I am no longer a professional developer. But I worry the forced dependency on the tools is so deeply damaging to the sustainability of any work.

Learning, friction, fibre and deep work are all important. Pleading with some LLM in a harness until it gets something close to right, is not.

@aburtch My heart truly goes out to the many, many people in tech whose jobs have turned into nightmares that way.

It's not like they can quit and walk across the road to a new job in an AI-free shop.

I hope that everyone can stay housed and fed and minimize the damage we do along the way as best we can, while we help each other out and look for ways to contribute to larger scale solutions.

@maxsidman Similar here:

*Use* an LLM? Frequently. Daily if you count Google search summaries, not quite every day but close if you count various LLM-based programming tools.

*Chat with* an LLM? Never voluntarily.

Sensitive content Reveal/hide

@foxes When we first got broadband internet here, tech came in, connected everything up, got no internet. Checked signal levels: all low. He went to his van, went through large paper maps of their cable network, then drove off.

45 minutes later, he returned, restarted everything, and we had internet.

He'd had to drive all over the place, tweaking signals at various places, to make it work.

When we see a tech in our area, we worry if our connection will go down so another's works!

@JHB17 chat. let's say by the conventional or a dictionary definition.

if the line has been blurred by makers of websites by all means carve it back in. everybody has the right to their own definition of any word.

@KittenKoder you can delete your bad faith provocation from my poll's comments.

you do not need to humiliate yourself on fediverse, we don't really do that here. you will be better suited to twitter dot com where they made a website specifically for people like you do do exactly that. you will genuinely love it there, I guarantee you will have found your people when you join elon musk's website.