Signal provides:

- Excellent protection against third party interception of communications (wiretapping).

- Limited protection against compromised (hacked) or lost devices

- No protection against certain common usage mistakes (accidentally including a reporter in your large group war planning chat).

This entry was edited (1 day ago)

reshared this

in reply to Matt Blaze

If you look at the systems that are supposed to be used for classified communications, the underlying cryptography isn’t particularly different from Signal (the AES cipher can be used to protect classified material). That’s not what failed here.

The difference is that systems like Signal are designed to *facilitate* communication with anyone. Classified systems are designed to *limit* communication to authorized recipients.

Both are sensible for their respective - very different - purposes.

in reply to Matt Blaze

"Signal" was Hitler's magazine published by the Wehrmacht of Nazi Germany from 1940. Recently Putin renamed his death squads Africa Corps same as the Nazi killers. Historical references names and dates are a favorite of the wanted war criminal Putin.

I hope the same name for "Signal" is just a coincidence.

@mattblaze

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal…

in reply to Matt Blaze

Notwithstanding the "oops we accidentally included a reporter in our top secret war planning", it kinda bothers me a little that the "You must return to office, if I don't see you working you're a slacker" crowd appears to themselves wholeheartedly embrace the kind of communications tech they don't want other people using. I mean, if you don't need to be in a conference room to discuss *how to invade a country*, it seems silly to require RTO for other things.
in reply to Matt Blaze

If a journalist like Jeff Goldberg was “accidentally” added to the group where Vance, Hagseth, etc., were discussing highly sensitive and obviously classified foreign policy and security issues, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Russians and Chinese had access to it without any trouble. What a disgraceful level of professionalism. I doubt anyone is even considering resigning over this. 🙄
in reply to Matt Blaze

Matt Blaze reminds us that Signal provides: "No protection against certain common usage mistakes (accidentally including a reporter in your large group war planning chat)." -- @mattblaze

Next minute:

"White House inadvertently texted top-secret Yemen war plans to journalist

In extraordinary blunder top Trump cabinet members added Atlantic editor to chat discussing strikes on Houthis"

theguardian.com/us-news/2025/m…